No items are available. Maybe upload some stuff?


Recent comments



BlueRose96

@DevilsCry To summarize everything this pack offers, think of all the head-hacking that is usually done to make Anthro-like models. This pack has it all done for us; it's as simple as zeroing the models and applying the flexes you want to smooth out the seams. The reason the pack is large in size is because of the variety of custom textures (different colored nipples and whatnot), but since a majority of the models need the original models and textures it's mimicking, you need to download the models you want (provided in the pdf file, just drag and drop into your browser of choice) and install them like you would any other model. Hopefully you'll have no problem actually using the links, unlike some brainless degenerates that complain about the sky being blue. (Also, Rarity's textures have to be downloaded from an earlier pack made by Ponynahka, everything else is in the provided links).

BlueRose96 posted 5 days ago to NexGen SFM Model Pack

BlueRose96

@ejuohbeoifuwj Your logic is not only unfathomable at this point, I'm suprised you're still complaining about the things you don't like on the internet. It's especially hilarious how you refuse to give any legitimate/coherent feedback without sounding like Artuurs having a field day, so perhaps you should do everyone (including yourself) a favor and "piss off" someone who gives a damn about your shitposting. You aren't required to like everything on this site as much as you're entitled to shit on everything you don't agree with. Maybe the next time someone asks for your help, you won't bang your head against the keyboard, which I'm sure is how you got your name: Mistake.

BlueRose96 posted 6 days, 11 hours ago to NexGen SFM Model Pack

BlueRose96

From the testing I've done, this is quite the leap in quality. Every angle you view the model (in this case, the Renamon 2019 Model) has this effect as if you're looking at a 2D image in 3D. It's pretty cool, especially since this can be altered even more with the morph flexes available. The only problems I've spotted are the lower jaw doing absolutely nothing and the HS1 Flex messes with the "fluf" on her back and shoulders, even when you have/not used the "hidefluf" flex. All in all, if this is what the Alikira Model is like, then SFMLab is in for a treat with your uploads.

BlueRose96 posted 2 weeks, 3 days ago to TAOMON + Renamon 2018/19

BlueRose96

Where do I begin with this model? I should preface this critique by saying I did test it beforehand. Now, I must also say how disappointed I am in a model that had potential but falls flatter than Artuurs' sex life. The exaggerated proportions and toon-like feel are the only qualities that are decent. The face rigging is awful and awkward, hell, some of the flexes are barely noticable and useless for anyone to use for nsfw purposes or not. Not to mention, the lack of flexes for the naughty bits (she has a vagina but nothing to alter it whatsoever?), but has plenty of bones for fixing certain proportions in the limbs? Finally, there isn't much going for the model regardless of how you look at it. I would think, it being 2019, that low-poly models would've been flushed out. It's dull, hardly attractive, and needs more work added to it so it really has an "oomph" to stand out. Unfortunately, it stands out for the wrong reasons.

BlueRose96 posted 1 month, 1 week ago to CumminHam's Leggy Lamb

BlueRose96

Well, this model is something different from the generic content uploaded in the past few months. Nice to see we're expanding our imagination to something nobody would be familiar with unless they played the games, so thanks for that. Only problems I found with it are the Boob Flexes indirectly interacting with the "Vagina" Flexes, I think you might have crossed the shapekeys with each other in the rigging process? Either way, it's a model worth checking out if you're into that kinda thing and before it's removed into obscurity.

BlueRose96 posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago to Lurantis (NSFW)

BlueRose96

@SumerianDragon You seemed to have misunderstood what I said, so I'll set the record straight. I was pointing out the similarities that the models shared (in this case, certain flexes) and was using the NexGen Models as an example. I wasn't making a big deal about them having the same flexes, but providing a reference other people could be familiar with if they happen to also use the NexGen models. Hell, the Daz Bodies used nowadays aren't really a problem for me; it's the lack of creativity behind what the Bodies are being used for (seriously, there are many variations of the same character on this site and others that could be achieved the same way but are built differently). No hate intended, just pointing out what I felt was necessary for others to know if they're curious to try out the models.

BlueRose96 posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago to "Hazard Core" female Luffthberts/Wolf PACK

BlueRose96

@warfaremachine After testing these models, I have a better idea of what they are now. The flexes that come with the models allow for more customization, which isn't shown in the screenshots provided (specifically the ones that alter the shape of the face). I also noticed that some of these flexes come from the NexGen Models, which isn't a bad thing since it's adds to the "variety" schtick you're going for. What I've said previously still applies, just further clarifying my statements.

BlueRose96 posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago to "Hazard Core" female Luffthberts/Wolf PACK

BlueRose96

@warframemachine You admitted to recycling the body used for the previous models (Krystal, Vivienne, etc.), and in this case, used them along with the same assets from those same models. The only difference being the appearance/cosmetics that are attached to the body, and you're calling it the "Wolf Pack." You're reusing something that was old and re-purposing it for something that's intended to be new. Most of it is new, but not all of it. That's what I was pointing out.

BlueRose96 posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago to "Hazard Core" female Luffthberts/Wolf PACK

BlueRose96

@warfaremachine I think for the sake of keeping everything fresh every once in a while, it would have been better to just have the "extra" stuff be in this pack and not the stuff that was already uploaded. It's one thing to upload something that's more up-to-date and is overall better, but it doesn't really make sense to upload the same thing twice and call it new. Most of the these "old" models look like someone edited them in SFM and tried to create an OC for themselves, but that's not what all of them are. I recommend just having this type of content be more consistent then worry about the variety. At least the models (old and new) look good, so it's worth maintaining this quality. As for ideas, more OC's would be nice. Just something that hasn't been done before and will suprise everyone, in a good way.

BlueRose96 posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago to "Hazard Core" female Luffthberts/Wolf PACK

BlueRose96

You must be getting low on ideas, because these are literally reskins of the previously uploaded furry models with the same hairs/flexes/body types. The only model you've uploaded that could be counted as new (aside from the updated versions of models) was the Nika Shark Model. These models aren't bad, mind you, but is it really necessary to repackage the same shit and call it something else as if it were something brand new?

BlueRose96 posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago to "Hazard Core" female Luffthberts/Wolf PACK